Please help to rewrite xmonad in Java!
Categories: Uncategorized
Leon // April 1, 2009 at 11:20 am | Reply
joke ?
Andreas Krey // April 1, 2009 at 2:58 pm | Reply
Heh. Still, it strikes me kind of odd that xmonad refuses to grow a configuration language, and hence a standard binary.
(Can you even do the low-level X access in pure java?)
colin Adams // April 1, 2009 at 3:34 pm | Reply
What’s Java?
Dressguard // April 1, 2009 at 4:41 pm | Reply
IDIOT!!!!
Michael Leuchtenburg // April 1, 2009 at 7:49 pm | Reply
I, for one, welcome our new object oriented bytecompiled overlords.
Feuerbach // April 1, 2009 at 11:12 pm | Reply
Colin: Java is a great programming language. It appeared a year later than Haskell — I think they predicted all kinds of headaches that lambdas can bring.
Name
E-mail
Website
Notify me of follow-up comments via email.
6 responses so far ↓
Leon // April 1, 2009 at 11:20 am |
joke ?
Andreas Krey // April 1, 2009 at 2:58 pm |
Heh. Still, it strikes me kind of odd that xmonad refuses to grow a configuration language, and hence a standard binary.
(Can you even do the low-level X access in pure java?)
colin Adams // April 1, 2009 at 3:34 pm |
What’s Java?
Dressguard // April 1, 2009 at 4:41 pm |
IDIOT!!!!
Michael Leuchtenburg // April 1, 2009 at 7:49 pm |
I, for one, welcome our new object oriented bytecompiled overlords.
Feuerbach // April 1, 2009 at 11:12 pm |
Colin: Java is a great programming language. It appeared a year later than Haskell — I think they predicted all kinds of headaches that lambdas can bring.